U.S. Fast Track Conference Bill neither Reflects America's Environmental Values nor Addresses Fundamental Problems with Investment Rules
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for International Environmental Law * Defenders of Wildlife
Earthjustice
Friends of the Earth * Greenpeace
League of Conservation Voters * Mineral Policy Center
National Environmental Trust * National Wildlife Federation
Natural Resources Defense Council * Sierra Club
U.S. Public Interest Research Group
July 26, 2002
Re: Oppose H.R. 3009, the Fast Track Conference Report
Dear Member of Congress:
On behalf of the more than one million members of our organizations, we urge you to oppose H.R. 3009, the fast track conference report. Trade agreements should promote environmental stewardship and guard against the weakening of environmental standards. Unfortunately, the conference report fails to meet that test.
The bill fails to address serious concerns with investor lawsuit rules like NAFTA's Chapter 11. It fails to ensure that non-discriminatory environmental protections are not subject to unjustified challenges by foreign investors. It also fails to ensure that international companies are not granted expropriation rights beyond those established by U.S. Supreme Court case law and must maintain "minimum treatment" rules no greater than the Constitutional due process standard.
The conference report deliberately fails to ensure parity between enforcement
of environmental and commercial provisions in future trade agreements.
For example, it includes language added by Senator Gramm (R-TX) that would
severely limit the circumstances in which trade measures could be used
to address countries' failure to enforce their environmental laws. In
several respects, it marks a major step back from the bipartisan Jordan
Free Trade Agreement and NAFTA environmental side agreement.
The conference report poses other serious environmental concerns. It fails
to provide adequate protection for Multilateral Environmental Agreements,
and provides only minimal assistance to help other countries improve their
environmental standards. In addition, it would block environmental progress
by promoting harmful regulatory tests and attacking consumer labeling
as a barrier to trade.
In order to restore the public's confidence in trade, Congress should support agreements that advance environmental stewardship and safeguard our environmental standards. We urge you to oppose the fast track conference report, because it simply does not meet these standards.
Sincerely,
|
Stephen Porter |
Robert Dewey Vice President for Government Affairs Defenders of Wildlife |
| Martin Hayden Legislative Director Earthjustice |
Sara Zdeb Legislative Representative Friends of the Earth |
| Andrea Durbin National Campaigns Director Greenpeace |
Mary Minette Legislative Director League of Conservation Voters |
| Lexi Shultz Legislative Director Mineral Policy Center |
Kevin Curtis Vice President, Government Relations National Environmental Trust |
| Paul Joffe Director, International Program National Wildlife Federation |
Alyssondra Campaigne Legislative Director Natural Resources Defense Council |
| Dan Seligman Director, Responsible Trade Program Sierra Club |
Anna Aurilio Legislative Director U.S. Public Interest Research Group |
This page last modified on 29 July 2002