![]() |
CIEL and partners publish reports
and presentations from a Capacity Building Workshop on the Relationship
between the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Convention
on Biological Diversity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Since its inception, discussions
in the Convention on Biological Diversitys Working Group on Access
and Benefit Sharing (ABS) have continuously referred to the World Intellectual
Property Organization. In particular, some delegations have argued that
intellectual property related issues such as the protection of traditional
knowledge and disclosure of origin in patent applications are best left
to WIPO to negotiate and implement. In addition, WIPO has been an active
participant in ABS deliberations, having been invited to present studies
and research on work related to ABS discussions. The co-sponsors organized
the meeting to meet a demand from indigenous, observer (NGOs) and
other local community participants in the ABS discussions to gain more information
and clarity regarding the nature and scope of the formal and informal relationship
between the ABS Working Group and WIPO, particularly in the context of the
states elaboration and negotiation of a proposed international regime
on access to genetic resources and traditional knowledge and benefit sharing.
With the understanding that the proposed international regime will undoubtedly
include intellectual property components and linkages with existing WIPO
conventions, treaties and processes, Indigenous peoples require educational
forums and opportunities to engage with Indigenous and other experts familiar
with WIPO, the CBD and other relevant international bodies. This capacity-building
workshop was organized to meet these identified needs.
The Meeting Report is available here. The meeting included:
For more information, please contact Dalindyebo Shabalala.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||