Explore the impactful amicus briefs and written statements CIEL has submitted to human rights and environmental cases at courts around the world. 

International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change

Defining States’ Climate Obligations and Responsibilities

International Court of Justice

March 20, 2024

CIEL submitted a written statement to the International Court of Justice for its advisory opinion process on the obligations of States in respect of climate change, which was requested by the United Nations General Assembly. In its submission, CIEL calls on the Court to clarify State duties to present and future generations with regard to climate change, including both obligations to prevent and redress harms from climate change that disproportionately impact those least responsible for the planetary emergency. The submission outlines State obligations and the legal consequences of their breach, examining the legal framework across four key areas:  1) Applicable Law; 2) Reparations for Climate Harm ; 3) Obligations to Phase Out Fossil Fuels; 4) Rights of Future Generations. (See press statement.)

 

Amicus brief submitted by CIEL to the International Court of Justice.
Read Full Submission

 

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion on the Climate Emergency and Human Rights

Corporate Accountability in the Climate Crisis

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

December 15, 2023
CIEL, along with Greenpeace International, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), the Open Society Justice Initiative (OSJI), and the New York University School of Law’s Climate Law Accelerator (CLX) submitted a joint amicus brief to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Supporting a request for an Advisory Opinion initiated by Colombia and Chile on the urgent climate emergency and its intersection with human rights, the brief highlights the role of the fossil fuel and agroindustry sectors in exacerbating climate change. It calls for strict regulation by States and responsible conduct by businesses, aiming to address the dire human rights impacts of the climate crisis and push for corporate accountability. (See press statement.)

A document titled 'Written Observations On The Request For An Advisory Opinion On The Climate Emergency And Human Rights, As Requested By The States Of Colombia And Chile'
Read Submission 

 

Challenging Fossil Fuels’ Role in Climate Change: A Legal Perspective

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

December 18, 2023
The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative’s recent submission to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights illuminates the critical link between fossil fuel production and the climate crisis. Highlighting the legal and human rights issues overlooked in fossil fuel activities, the brief argues for the necessity of phasing out fossil fuels to combat global warming and protect human rights. Urging developed nations to lead with support for developing countries, this pivotal move supports a just transition away from fossil fuels, aligning with Colombia and Chile’s call for an Advisory Opinion on climate and human rights. In addition to being a member of the Treaty Initiative, CIEL provided input and assistance in the preparation of this submission.

A document titled 'Amicus Brief Submitted to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights by the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative'
Read Submission

 

Call for Reparations for Climate Harm

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

December 18, 2023
In a submission to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, CIEL, La Ruta del Clima, the Inter-American Association for Environmental Defense (AIDA), and the International Network for Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights emphasized the urgent need for reparations for communities affected by the climate crisis. This amicus brief, submitted in response to the Advisory Opinion request from Colombia and Chile on climate and human rights, argues for the right to reparation in the wake of climate change, insisting that measures to address loss and damage must align with human rights obligations under international law. It urges the Court to affirm that climate actions, including the establishment of loss and damage funds, must meet human rights standards and not preclude further reparations demands. This submission marks a step toward ensuring justice and comprehensive reparations for victims of climate impacts. (Submitted in Spanish.)

A document titled Solicitud de Opinión Consultiva de la República de Chile y la República de Colombia sobre “Emergencia Climática y Derechos Humanos”
Read Submission

 

Strengthening Environmental Defenders’ Rights in the Climate Crisis

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

December 18, 2023
A coalition of affected communities, along with environmental and human rights organizations (including the CIEL, Fundación para el Desarrollo de Políticas Sustentables, and others), submitted an amicus brief to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. This submission, in response to the Advisory Opinion request from Colombia and Chile, focuses on the critical role of environmental and territorial defenders amidst the climate emergency and the energy transition. It argues that States, under the American Convention on Human Rights, have specific obligations to protect these defenders, including ensuring their safety, preventing attacks against them, and investigating crimes committed against them. The brief emphasizes the importance of ratifying and implementing the Escazú Agreement to bolster access rights and safeguard the work of environmental defenders, highlighting the unique vulnerabilities faced by women in these roles and advocating for gender-sensitive public policies to address the climate crisis’s impacts. (Submitted in Spanish.)

Read Submission

 

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Advisory Opinion on Climate Change and International Law

Interpreting States’ Climate Duties to Ensure Marine Protection

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)

June 15, 2023

CIEL, along with Greenpeace International, submitted a memorial to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) for its advisory opinion on the scope of State responsibility concerning climate change and ocean protection, which was requested by the Commission of Small Island States (COSIS). Highlighting the urgency of the climate crisis, its origins, and its far-reaching consequences, the brief argues that greenhouse gas emissions are a form of marine pollution under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It urges ITLOS to interpret States’ duties to protect the marine environment in alignment with principles of international environmental and human rights law, based on the best available science, and with an emphasis on actions necessary to mitigate climate change and safeguard the oceans. The recommendations include halting new fossil fuel projects, transitioning to renewable energy, and prioritizing measures that provide immediate climate benefits rather than speculative technologies. (See perspective piece.)

A document titled 'international Tribunal For The Law Of The Sea Case No. 31. Request For An Advisory Opinion Submitted By The Commission Of Small Island States On Climate Change And International Law. (Request For Advisory Opinion Submitted To The Tribunal)’
Read Submission

 

 

European Court of Human Rights Landmark Cases on State Responsibility to Prevent Climate-Related Harm

Laying Out States’ Obligations to Keep Warming Below 1.5°C

European Court of Human Rights

December 5, 2022
CIEL, along with Greenpeace International and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), submitted an amicus brief in the European Court of Human Rights case Duarte Agostinho et al. v. Portugal et al., in which six youth plaintiffs from Portugal argue that government climate inaction discriminates against young people and poses a risk to their lives and health. This submission underscores the international legal and scientific consensus that warming must be limited to 1.5°C, and the associated legal obligations of States on climate change. The brief argues that States’ climate action must be guided by the best available science and assessed against human rights law. It emphasizes that States must demonstrate actions that are most likely to keep warming below 1.5°C to be in line with their human rights obligations.
Read Amicus Brief

 

 

 

States’ Obligations Require Taking Proven Climate Measures

European Court of Human Rights

December 5, 2022

CIEL along with Dr. Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh submitted an amicus brief in the European Court of Human Rights case Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz et al. v. Switzerland, brought by Swiss senior women challenging the adequacy of Switzerland’s climate policy. Against the background of current science, this brief argues that the State’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights to prevent foreseeable environmental and human rights harms must be interpreted consistently with science and international law. It further argues why climate policies that rely on risky and infeasible offsets and carbon dioxide removal, rather than taking robust and proven domestic emissions reduction actions, are inconsistent with the State’s human rights obligations.

Read Amicus Brief